-
NoleBrave03 said...
One person who is alot more connected then you or I for example is the UF 247 writer. Alot of other writers via twitter has stated their opinion that the USC punishment is going to be very similar to the Miami situation.
andrew32
- 5 stars Rating: 85
1684 votes total - Yukon Cornelius
- (3952)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
NoleBrave03 said...
One person who is alot more connected then you or I for example is the UF 247 writer. Alot of other writers via twitter has stated their opinion that the USC punishment is going to be very similar to the Miami situation.
andrew32
- 5 stars Rating: 85
1684 votes total - Yukon Cornelius
- (3952)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
NoleBrave03 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 75
763 votes total - (7944)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
NoleBrave03 said...
You seem to think that the NCAA needs to have allegations PROVEN for NCAA to hammer Miami, that seems to be a part you are oblivious to. NCAA doesnt have to prove anything. All they have to "prove" is that Miami should have known. And unless something has changed in the past few months, Auburn is still under investigation for the Cam Newton scandal.
andrew32
- 5 stars Rating: 85
1684 votes total - Yukon Cornelius
- (3952)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
andrew32 said...
Wow! I just don't what else to say to you.
The following is a paragraph from the article I linked.
"The NCAA enforcement staff is committed to a fair and thorough investigative process," the NCAA said in a statement. "As such, any allegations of major rules violations must meet a burden of proof, which is a higher standard than rampant public speculation online and in the media. The allegations must be based on credible and persuasive information and includes a good-faith belief that the Committee on Infractions could make a finding.
You don't have a clue what your talking about. Please go away.
-
Canes2082 said...
Marcos... first off your getting +1 for the tailgating picture in little havana. Some great memories tailgating outside the OB
However, 2 bowl bans on top of 20-23 scholly's is a bit excessive considering many facts
1. We assisted in the investigation from Day 1
2. We punished the players involved while they were still in school. In USC's case, the player(s) in question had left for the NFL and NBA respectively. The school was non-compliant and thus they got hammered for that very reason. Not to mention Reggie took about 300-350K in illegal benefits
3. The coach in question or coaches are both gone to other schools. The NCAA is making it more of a priority to punish coaches who knew or participated in the illegal benefits. Ex: Bruce Pearl, Jim Tressel, and Tim Floyd
4. Imposing a bowl ban was a good "show of faith". Ohio State rolled the dice, threw up some middle fingers once Urban got there, had some more athletes receive illegal benefits while they were under investigation. Thats why they nailed them with the 1 year bowl ban.
I do believe we will have scholarship reductions. Just don't know how many and thats where they can really hit us if they want too.
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Pages: 1 | 2 | Refresh


Hoping for NCAA to end the investigation soon